The most
important thing to say about this entire film is that the performances given by
Jim Broadbent as Denis Thatcher and even more notably by Meryl Streep as
Margaret Thatcher are phenomenal. If Meryl Streep isn’t the odds on favourite
for an Oscar then I will be very surprised. Her portrayal of the former Prime
Minister, her accent, and even her demeanour seems at times uncanny. The
make-up and ageing effects are extraordinary, and the film is a Streep
masterpiece with her acting skills on full display.
Yet beware as
this is where my admiration of the film comes to an end. Based on the title and
from having seen the trailer, I was excited and looking forward to seeing a
film about the only female parliamentarian leader that Britain has ever known.
I had assumed,
perhaps hoped that the film would show and unseen side of Thatcher at the
height of her power. I had hoped for a blend of artful fiction combined with
facts and perhaps opinions of those who governed alongside her or in
opposition.
I had hoped to
glimpse a side of the women that ruled with rigour and a firm hand. Too young
myself to remember the times clearly I had thought that the film would focus on
the most contentious issues of her time in power, the miner’s strikes, the
battle with the unions, the Falklands war, the IRA, and how this lower middle
class grocer’s daughter managed to find a way to the top of the greasy pole and
remain in power for more than a decade. However, after twenty minutes in it was
clear that the film was not going to deliver on any one of my expectations.
The early years
of Thatcher’s career are glossed over, her struggle to become the first female
Prime Minister in a rise up within a sea of men is hardly touched upon, and the
most infamous policy decisions that she made are barely footnoted. Anyone
wishing to see this film for any kind of reference to the events of the late
70s and throughout the 80’s will be severely disappointed. This film is less a
look at the Iron Lady herself, but more on the brutal and cruel effects of
dementia.
The film’s
focus is on Thatcher as an old lady, struggling with the cruel and degenerative
effects dementia has on the mind. She struggles to accept that her husband has
died and any political drama in the film is seen as flashbacks in the declining
mental agility of Thatcher. Whether intended to illicit sympathy, or intended
as a profound look at the effects of this disease or age on even the most
influential of figures, I am unsure. Given that Baroness Thatcher is still
alive, I feel there are a number of elements in this film that cut to close to
the quick and leaves the viewer wondering just how much of what is portrayed in
a true representation and what is purely artistic licence and fictional
writing.
Whether an
advocate or opponent of Thatcher’s politics, I think the majority of people
will be hoping that this is a film about the woman behind the politics of the
time. It is not. This is not the hard hitting film that I had expected or even
anticipated, and given its subject matter I felt a little let down.
Streep is truly
spectacular and the film is reflective in many ways of the nature and effects
of dementia. All I would say though is that if you are looking for West Wing
style political drama or a better understanding of the Iron Lady herself then
this film is not going to meet your needs. I know no more of the politics, the
decision making that went into the policy decisions, or how Thatcher made it as
leader of the Conservative Party and then Leader of the country than I did before
I went to see the film.
This is a
depiction of an Old Lady more than it is of the infamous Iron Lady.
You've persuaded me not to see the film! I'm very surprised at the lack of political content, although a good documentary would probably tell you more about her than any movie. I guess you'll have to wait until she dies for those documentaries to come on air.
ReplyDelete